Saturday, June 16, 2012
Tuesday, June 12, 2012
RP-style democracy breeds mediocre leaders - Mahathir
The
Daily Tribune
06/12/2012
Too
much democracy has as trade off slow progress and a mediocre
leadership.
This
was how former Malaysian Prime Minister Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad
described the pitfalls of the style of democracy being practiced in
the Philippines in a speech delivered yesterday at the University of
Santo Tomas (UST).
Mahathir
led Malaysia for 22 years from 1981 to 2003 to turn his country into
one of the Asian tigers under a leadership which some describe as a
benign dictatorship.
For
the Philippine-style democracy to work, the government must have a
leader who “in particular must be incorruptible,” Mahathir said
in his keynote lecture at a special convocation at the UST yesterday.
“His
being (incorruptible) will lessen the level of corruption among those
under him. There will still be corruption but the degree would be
less…, he added.
“In
every country there are great people who should lead, but seeing the
filth in politics and the fears of those who come into power and who
are unwilling to take risks and so very often the leaders are
mediocre people at best,” Mahathir said.
“A
leader is as good as the ideas that he has. To bring prosperity to
the country, he must know what policies to adopt and what strategies
to employ,” he added.
Evidently
referring to the electoral process in the country and in neighboring
Thailand, Mahathir said “no sooner is a government elected when the
losers would hold demonstrations and general strikes, accusing the
government of malpractices.”
“The
government has to deal with these disruptions and neglect the work of
governing and development that it is expected to carry out. The
disruption could be so serious as to force the government to resign,”
he said.
“Really
the countries of Southeast Asia have great potential for growth,
prosperity and empowerment. All we need are people and leaders who
love their country and people more than they love themselves,” he
said.
Mahathir
indicated that democracy only works when the people understand its
limitations. He said democracy would not bring the goodness that it
promised when people think only of the freedoms of democracy and know
nothing of the implied responsibilities.
“Instead,
it will result only in instability, and instability will not permit
development to take place and the people to enjoy the benefits of
freedom and the rights that democracy promises,” he said.
Mahathir
was conferred with an honorary professorship by UST, which is
bestowed on distinguished foreign individuals who have achieved
exceptional distinction in their respective fields of expertise.
“No
doubt democracy is being practised by this country. But is it really
what democracy is all about? Is democracy the end or the means? If we
think that democracy is the end, then well and good. But why did we
change from autocracy to democracy? Wasn’t it because autocracy had
failed to deliver the good life that we wanted? We believed that
since it is the people who disapproved of autocracy, then if the
people were to rule the country, then surely they would rule
themselves well,” Mahathir said.
He
said the rule of the majority does not always produce the best
results for a nation. “We cannot assume majority of the people must
be intelligent. In many instances, majority is not intelligent and
the minority refuses to be involved because they think politics is
dirty. If you don’t manage democracy well it is not going to pay
dividends,“ he said.
“We
are living in a tumultuous world, in a world of political turmoil, in
a world of economic turmoil, in a world of social turmoil. We are
seeing the collapse of moral values and of beliefs. All the things
that we used to value are being questioned, scrutinized and in many
cases rejected, to be replaced by what is called freedom, freedom
which is enjoyed by some at the expense of others, often at the
expense of the community as a whole,” he added.
Mahathir
also had something to say about technological advances being abused
to undermine governments.
“We
are seeing advances in technology, advances which bring great
benefits but which are also open to abuses, negating much of the
benefits. Privacy is being invaded. Secrets, including sensitive
military secrets are being leaked in the name of freedom of
information. The whistle-blowers are hailed as heroes. Nothing is
sacred any more,” he said.
Mahathir
said that while democracy was the best system of governance ever
devised by man, it only works when people understand its limitations.
Noting
that Malaysia was not a liberal democracy, he said democracy was
viewed principally as providing an “easy way” to change
governments.
“No
revolution, no civil wars, no Arab spring. Just vote and the
government will be brought down or re-elected according to the wishes
of the people,” Mahathir said.
He
said in Malaysia’s election process, candidates from opposition
parties could win and they had indeed captured a number of state
governments.
On
leadership, Dr Mahathir said it must not be corrupt and need vision
about the development of the country.
“A
leader is as good as the ideas that he has. To bring prosperity to
the country, he must know what policies to adopt and what strategies
to employ,” he said.
Turning
to the economy, Dr Mahathir, who has been courted by Yemen to be its
special economic advisor, said he believed that in this troubled
economic climate, Asean should co-operate more productively and make
use of its market of half a billion people.
The
Malaysian Foreign Ministry said Dr Mahathir and his wife, Tun Dr Siti
Hasmah Mohd Ali, were received on arrival in Manila yesterday by the
Malaysian envoy to the Philippines, Datuk Seri Dr Ibrahim Saad, and
other embassy officials.
Dr
Mahathir attended a gathering with the Malaysian community as well as
delivered a keynote speech on “Nation Building and Economic
Development” at a dinner organised by the Asia Society at a leading
hotel there.
Wednesday, June 6, 2012
3rd RTD on Structural Reforms
Here's a link to the Third Round Table Discussions on Structural Reforms at the UAP/CRC on 07 March 2012. The discussions were focused on unicameral parliamentarism.
http://uap.asia/crc/index.php/2012/04/stabilizing-the-economy-through-reform-of-political-institutions/
http://uap.asia/crc/index.php/2012/04/stabilizing-the-economy-through-reform-of-political-institutions/
2nd RTD on Structural Reforms
Here's a link to the Second Round Table Discussions on Structural Reform at the UAP/CRC on 12 October 2011. The discussions focused further on the liberalization of foreign investments.
http://uap.asia/crc/index.php/2011/10/economic-provisions-in-the-constitution-2nd-round-table-discussion/
http://uap.asia/crc/index.php/2011/10/economic-provisions-in-the-constitution-2nd-round-table-discussion/
1st RTD on Structural Reform
Here's a link to the First Round Table Discussions on Structural Reforms at the UAP/CRC on 01 July 2011. Discussions are focused on the liberalization of foreign investments.
http://uap.asia/crc/index.php/2011/07/structural-reform-1st-round-table-discussion/
http://uap.asia/crc/index.php/2011/07/structural-reform-1st-round-table-discussion/
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)