Tuesday, December 15, 2009

White Paper on the MILF Peace Talks; Implications on Constitutional Reform

The paper entitled Comments on the GRP-MILF Peace Process opines that the MOA-AD is constitutional. Nonetheless, it strongly disagrees with its wisdom.

Part I seeks to analyze the rational, purpose, implications and constitutionality of the scrapped GRP-MILF Memorandum of Agreement on Ancestral Domain (MOA-AD).

Part II identifies the fundamental flaws of the agreement and the underlying negotiation process, and recommends appropriate pre-emptive and corrective measures for any revival of the failed process.

Part III proposes bold alternative consensus points, guided by the standard of the common good of all the people concerned.

Among other reforms, the paper proposes or implies constitutional amendments for the: (1) establishment of regional governments based on culture and geography rather than religion; (2) grant of titles of royalty to the southern sultanates; and (3) liberalization of foreign investments.

Please see the following link: http://www.deszr.com/index.php?option=com_jotloader&section=files&task=download&cid=8_72624422e5f78977b04c6f7616306817&Itemid=61

Friday, October 16, 2009

Liberalization of Professional Practice

The article below may provide the rational for the liberalization of the practice of professions in connection with the pursuit of constitutional economic reform.

Professional concerns
MY FOUR CENTAVOS
By Dean Andy Bautista
(The Philippine Star)
Updated October 17, 2009

As in any public policy debate, there are pros and cons in allowing foreigners to practice their professions here.

The main point raised against liberalizing the practice of professions is the potential unemployment that may arise among the local professionals. Critics argue that the “work-pie” in the Philippines is so small that allowing foreigners to come in would further crowd an already crowded market.On the other hand, the benefits of opening up the professional services sector are apparent.

First, the resulting competition will encourage if not compel local professionals to improve their know-how to be at par with their foreign counterparts.

Second, there is a view that the entry of foreign professionals would not cause dislocation but actually create more jobs as foreign professional firms operating here will be on the lookout for Philippine professionals to work with. This has been the experience of Asian countries such as Japan, Singapore and Hong Kong where the entry of foreign professionals spurred direct foreign investment which in turn led to an expansion, instead of a contraction, of the “work-pie.”

Third, allowing foreign firms to set up shop in the country will lead not only to a transfer of technology and skills but also to higher wages that reflect industry standards. Cases in point would be the Metro Manila BPOs of Baker & McKenzie and White & Case, two large international law firms, which employ thousands of Filipinos. Parenthetically, this move may also stem the exodus of Filipino professionals abroad.

Finally, by allowing foreigners to practice their professions in the country, the Philippines will be complying with its treaty obligations as a member of the WTO and its being a signatory to the General Agreement on Trade and Services as well as the ASEAN Framework Agreement on Services. And aside from the advantage of being a good global citizen, the country should face the reality that globalization is here to stay and the earlier we accept this fact, the more we can benefit from it...

As a young boy learning how to play table tennis, I was advised that the best way to improve your game was to play with players better than you. A similar principle applies in this case. Needless to say, Filipinos are, by and large, naturally competent and predisposed to hard work. All they need is the opportunity and right atmosphere to flourish. My four centavos is that liberalizing our professional services sector will contribute to the creation of such opportunities and an atmosphere conducive to growth.




Wednesday, July 29, 2009

Liberalization of foreign investments

The proposed constitutional amendments seek economic reform for the benefit of the middle class and the masa class, through the liberalization of nationality requirements for foreign direct investments.

The amendments aim to create jobs, reduce consumer prices, transfer technologies, promote economic growth, strengthen free competition and enhance efficiency, by eliminating artificial legal barriers to foreign direct investments. Human Capital in the Emerging Economy, Report and Recommendations of the Congressional Commission on Labor, Congress of the Philippines, February 2001, pages 47, 59 and 88. See Foreign Investments Act of 1991, as amended, Sec. 2.

Notably, these barriers benefit only the few elite monopolists and oligopolists, at the expense of the majority of workers and consumers, who are unfairly deprived of job opportunities and cheaper goods and services, as a natural consequence of the investment limitations.

Furthermore, the amendments adopt the “principle of flexibility” where economic policy is allowed to evolve through the continuing process of legislation and policy-making, instead of being fixed regardless of changes in the milieu. Alexander R. Magno, First Person column, Delete article, Philippine Star, 13 December 2008.

Finally, the amendments transcribe the desired amendments by way of deletion, without the incorporation of new language, in order to avoid lengthy debates on wording and instead focus discussions on their rational and purpose. Id.

[words, phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs deleted]






THE 1987 CONSTITUTION
OF THE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES
ARTICLE XII
NATIONAL ECONOMY AND PATRIMONY

Section 2. All lands of the public domain, waters, minerals, coal, petroleum, and other mineral oils, all forces of potential energy, fisheries, forests or timber, wildlife, flora and fauna, and other natural resources are owned by the State. With the exception of agricultural lands, all other natural resources shall not be alienated. The exploration, development, and utilization of natural resources shall be under the full control and supervision of the State. The State may directly undertake such activities, or it may enter into co-production, joint venture, or production-sharing agreements [with Filipino citizens, or corporations or associations at least sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens. Such agreements may be for a period not exceeding twenty-five years, renewable for not more than twenty-five years, and] under such terms and conditions as may be provided by law. [In cases of water rights for irrigation, water supply fisheries, or industrial uses other than the development of water power, beneficial use may be the measure and limit of the grant.]

The State shall protect the nation's marine wealth in its archipelagic waters, territorial sea, and exclusive economic zone[, and reserve its use and enjoyment exclusively to Filipino citizens].

[The Congress may, by law, allow small-scale utilization of natural resources by Filipino citizens, as well as cooperative fish farming, with priority to subsistence fishermen and fish-workers in rivers, lakes, bays, and lagoons.]

The President may enter into agreements [with foreign-owned corporations] involving either technical or financial assistance for THE [large-scale] exploration, development, and utilization of minerals, petroleum, and other mineral oils according to the general terms and conditions provided by law[, based on real contributions to the economic growth and general welfare of the country]. [In such agreements, the State shall promote the development and use of local scientific and technical resources.]

[The President shall notify the Congress of every contract entered into in accordance with this provision, within thirty days from its execution.]

Section 3. Lands of the public domain are classified into agricultural, forest or timber, mineral lands and national parks. Agricultural lands of the public domain may be further classified by law according to the uses to which they may be devoted. Alienable lands of the public domain shall be limited to agricultural lands. [Private corporations or associations may not hold such alienable lands of the public domain except by lease, for a period not exceeding twenty-five years, renewable for not more than twenty-five years, and not to exceed one thousand hectares in area. Citizens of the Philippines may lease not more than five hundred hectares, or acquire not more than twelve hectares thereof by purchase, homestead, or grant.]

[Taking into account the requirements of conservation, ecology, and development, and subject to the requirements of agrarian reform, the] Congress shall determine, by law, the size of lands of the public domain which may be acquired, developed, held, or leased and the conditions therefor.

Section 7. [Save in cases of hereditary succession, no private lands shall be transferred or conveyed except to individuals, corporations, or associations qualified to acquire or hold lands of
the public domain.]

Section 8. [Notwithstanding the provisions of Section 7 of this Article, a natural-born citizen of the Philippines who has lost his Philippine citizenship may be a transferee of private lands, subject to limitations provided by law.]

Section 10. [The Congress shall, upon recommendation of the economic and planning agency, when the national interest dictates, reserve to citizens of the Philippines or to corporations or associations at least sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens, or such higher percentage as Congress may prescribe, certain areas of investments. The Congress shall enact measures that will encourage the formation and operation of enterprises whose capital is wholly owned by Filipinos.]

[In the grant of rights, privileges, and concessions covering the national economy and patrimony, the State shall give preference to qualified Filipinos.]

[The State shall regulate and exercise authority over foreign investments within its national jurisdiction and in accordance with its national goals and priorities.]

Section 11. No franchise, certificate, or any other form of authorization for the operation of a public utility shall be granted [except to citizens of the Philippines or to corporations or associations organized under the laws of the Philippines at least sixty per centum of whose capital is owned by such citizens, nor shall such franchise, certificate, or authorization be exclusive in character or for a longer period than fifty years. Neither shall any such franchise or right be granted] except under the condition that it shall be subject to amendment, alteration, or repeal by the Congress when the common good so requires. [The State shall encourage equity participation in public utilities by the general public. The participation of foreign investors in the governing body of any public utility enterprise shall be limited to their proportionate share in its capital, and all the executive and managing officers of such corporation or association must be citizens of the Philippines.]

Section 14. The sustained development of a reservoir of national talents consisting of Filipino scientists, entrepreneurs, professionals, managers, high-level technical manpower and skilled workers and craftsmen in all fields shall be promoted by the State. The State shall encourage appropriate technology and regulate its transfer for the national benefit.

[The practice of all professions in the Philippines shall be limited to Filipino citizens, save in cases prescribed by law.]






ARTICLE XIV
EDUCATION

Section 4. (1) The State recognizes the complementary roles of public and private institutions in the educational system and shall exercise reasonable supervision and regulation of
all educational institutions.

(2) [Educational institutions, other than those established by religious groups and mission boards, shall be owned solely by citizens of the Philippines or corporations or associations at least sixty per centum of the capital of which is owned by such citizens. The Congress may, however, require increased Filipino equity participation in all educational institutions.]

[The control and administration of educational institutions shall be vested in citizens of the Philippines.]

[No educational institution shall be established exclusively for aliens and no group of aliens shall comprise more than one-third of the enrollment in any school. The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to schools established for foreign diplomatic personnel and their dependents and, unless otherwise provided by law, for other foreign temporary residents.]

(3) All revenues and assets of non-stock, non-profit educational institutions used actually, directly, and exclusively for educational purposes shall be exempt from taxes and duties. Upon the dissolution or cessation of the corporate existence of such institutions, their assets shall be disposed of in the manner provided by law.

Proprietary educational institutions, including those cooperatively owned, may likewise be entitled to such exemptions subject to the limitations provided by law including restrictions on dividends and provisions for reinvestment.

(4) Subject to conditions prescribed by law, all grants, endowments, donations, or contributions used actually, directly, and exclusively for educational purposes shall be exempt from tax.






ARTICLE XVI
GENERAL PROVISIONS

Section 11. [(1) The ownership and management of mass media shall be limited to citizens of the Philippines, or to corporations, cooperatives or associations, wholly-owned and managed by such citizens.]

[The Congress shall regulate or prohibit monopolies in commercial mass media when the public interest so requires. No combinations in restraint of trade or unfair competition therein shall be allowed.]

[(2) The advertising industry is impressed with public interest, and shall be regulated by law for the protection of consumers and the promotion of the general welfare.]

[Only Filipino citizens or corporations or associations at least seventy per centum of the capital of which is owned by such citizens shall be allowed to engage in the advertising industry.]

[The participation of foreign investors in the governing body of entities in such industry shall be limited to their proportionate share in the capital thereof, and all the executive and managing officers of such entities must be citizens of the Philippines.]




The proposed amendments were written ex-gratia by Demosthenes B. Donato for the We Citizen Advocates for Reforms Movement (We Care), Inc. (Kilusan ng Mamamayang Nagmamalasakit sa Bayan). All intellectual property rights are granted to the public domain.





Sunday, July 26, 2009

Congressional exercise of constituent power

This article presents the view that Congress is vested with legal authority to propose amendments to the 1987 Constitution, upon a vote of three-fourths of all its Members, conducted either in a separate or joint meeting of the Senate and the House of Representatives, whereby the respective votes of the Senators and the Representatives are counted cumulatively, without applying any separate voting requirement for the Senate and the House of Representatives. Please see the following link:

http://www.deszr.com/index.php?option=com_jotloader&section=files&task=download&cid=9_067efec41b82993d9590cb787db3248b&Itemid=61




Three (3) basic advantages of the Unicameral Parliamentary System

The article on Unicameral Parliamentarism presents the advocacy for the establishment of a unicameral parliament, in lieu of the presidential system with a bicameral legislature. It summarizes the basic advantages of the unicameral parliamentary system in the Philippine setting.

The article may be downloaded from the following link:

http://deszr.com/index.php?option=com_jotloader&section=files&task=download&cid=28_58c049a20cce1a0b5965e98b962cfd4d&Itemid=57



Tatlong (3) pangunahing kapakinabangan ng sistemang Parlamentong Unikameral

The article on Unicameral Parliamentarism, written in Tagalog, presents the advocacy for the establishment of a unicameral parliament, in lieu of the presidential system with a bicameral legislature. It summarizes the basic advantages of the unicameral parliamentary system in the Philippine setting.

The article may be downloaded from the following link:

http://deszr.com/index.php?option=com_jotloader&section=files&task=download&cid=29_002a546b1f9fa1653ebabe3fd786c241&Itemid=57



American Bicameralism not applicable to the Philippines

The article on Bicameralism, supports the advocacy for a unicameral legislature, and explains why American bicameralism is not applicable to the Philippines.

The article may be downloaded from the following link:

http://deszr.com/index.php?option=com_jotloader&section=files&task=download&cid=6_175854940efe53ad6f63b283d5062d0f&Itemid=57



Ang American Bicameralism ay hindi angkop sa ating Bayan

The article on Bicameralism, written in Tagalog, supports the advocacy for a unicameral legislature, and explains why American bicameralism is not applicable to the Philippines.

The article may be downloaded from the following link:

http://deszr.com/index.php?option=com_jotloader&section=files&task=download&cid=7_d2d74eed0fd966d889dc4acbaa1c778c&Itemid=57





American Presidentialism not applicable to the Philippines

The article on Presidentialism supports the advocacy for a parliament with indirect elections, and explains why American presidentialism is not applicable to the Philippines.

The article may be downloaded from the following link:

http://deszr.com/index.php?option=com_jotloader&section=files&task=download&cid=21_9cfd676c6db58244aa10828df20fe563&Itemid=57




Ang American Presidentialism ay hindi angkop sa ating Bayan

The article on Presidentialism, written in Tagalog, supports the advocacy for a parliament with indirect elections, and explains why American presidentialism is not applicable to the Philippines.

The article may be downloaded from the following link:

http://deszr.com/index.php?option=com_jotloader&section=files&task=download&cid=22_da8576dfcdd24bb7ad680cbdf10407f7&Itemid=57



Indirect Elections for President is the better method Representative Democracy

The article on Indirect Elections supports the advocacy for a unicameral parliament, and explains why indirect elections for chief executive is the better method of representative democracy for the Philippines.

The article may be downloaded from the following link:

http://deszr.com/index.php?option=com_jotloader&section=files&task=download&cid=10_2c3acd7787a403460397055db619ff22&Itemid=57



Di Direktang Halalan sa Presidente ay ang higit na mabuting paraan ng Pangkinatawang Demokrasya

The article on Indirect Elections, written in Tagalog, supports the advocacy for a unicameral parliament, and explains why indirect elections for chief executive is the better method of representative democracy for the Philippines.
The article may be downloaded from the following link:





Unicameral Parliament: the 1899 Malolos Constitution and the proposed amendments to the 1987 Constitution

This article presents the legal and historical bases of the proposed amendments to the 1987 Constitution establishing a unicameral parliament, by showing in tabular format the fundamental similarity, in both substance and form, between the subject amendments and the pertinent provisions of the 1899 Malolos Constitution.

Please see the following link:

http://www.deszr.com/index.php?option=com_jotloader&section=files&task=download&cid=25_085f4a97ea11c12aa2c96c6db4d3c841&Itemid=61



Unicameral Parliament: proposed amendments to the 1987 Constitution

This article contains the full text of the proposed amendments to the 1987 Constitution establishing a unicameral parliament. The proposition provides for regional representatives and regional voting, sectoral representatives and sectoral voting, and a council of state. It also provides for the temporary disqualification of individuals and their relatives, who at any time held certain offices in government, during the first term of the unicameral parliament. Please see the following links:

Full text of the proposed amendments to the 1987 Constitution establishing a unicameral parliament

http://www.deszr.com/index.php?option=com_jotloader&section=files&task=download&cid=23_5ba28e3b4695b7e6c9ed75b3a994241d&Itemid=61

Full text of the proposed amendments to the 1987 Constitution establishing a unicameral parliament (Tagalog)

http://www.deszr.com/index.php?option=com_jotloader&section=files&task=download&cid=24_f9b45c17ce6043cf3565f050640cc8b5&Itemid=61