Sunday, January 23, 2022

KTB GUIDELINES IN CHOOSING SENATORIAL CANDIDATES


GUIDELINES IN CHOOSING SENATORIAL CANDIDATES 


QUALIFICATIONS

1. Those who support the immediate lifting of legal restrictions on foreign investments, to strengthen free and open competition, and promote job creation, price reduction and tax generation, subject to safeguards to protect national security, and to reciprocity to promote national interest.

2. Those who support the scheduled shift to a parliamentary form of government, coupled with a council-type LGU, to institute collegial rule (by an assembly of people’s representatives elected from single-member districts), instead of one-man rule (by one chief executive elected at large), and promote political democracy.

3. Those who support the gradual decentralization of the national government to empower the regions, by supporting the growth and enabling the development of regional centers, under either a regional authority, autonomous region or substate.

 

DISQUALIFICATIONS

1. Those who voted for the impeachment and conviction of the late CJ Renato Corona, amidst charges of bribery by the Aquino administration, using public funds sourced from the unconstitutional DAP, for apparent political considerations; this anomaly shook to the core the entire judicial branch of government, a major pillar of our democracy.

2. Those who support, aid and abet the communist rebels of the CPP-NPA-NDF, a declared terrorist organization, like those from KABAG (Kabataan-Anakbayan-Bayan Muna-ACT-Gabriela); they aim to take power through violence, intimidation, deceit, and class war among fellow Filipinos.

3. Those who support religious extremists (like the Abu Sayyaf, Maute, etc.) that terrorize and wage war against peoples of different beliefs; religious intolerance of other beliefs, like those of Christians, moderate Islam, and Animists (i.e. Indigenous People), has no place in our democracy.

4. Those who defend the COMELEC and its technology supplier, SMARTMATIC, in their brazen disablement of techno-legal safeguards, and obstinate refusal to undergo digital forensic examination; the lack of transparency in the counting of the votes casts a dark cloud of doubt over the integrity of automated elections.

5. Those who engage in excessive propaganda using tri-media (i.e. ABS-CBN, GMA7, ABC5, Inquirer, Philstar, etc.) and social media (i.e. Facebook, Twitter, etc.), but have nothing show in actual hard projects on the ground. 

6. Those who resist constitutional reform, and defend the existing monopolies and oligopolies of the local elite in industries indispensable to national interest (i.e. telecommunication, transportation, power, water, natural resources, mass media, education, etc.), using the law to protect their vested interests, and bar competition from otherwise legitimate industry players. 

7. Those who resist constitutional reform, and hold on to the present presidential form, that institutionalizes one-man rule, where a single individual controls the entire executive branch, and appoints all the justices, who cannot be sued, and cannot be removed except by impeachment, without regard to the sentiment of the assembly of people’s representatives. 

8. Those who resist constitutional reform, and hold on to the present unitary system, that institutionalizes highly centralized governance, where all the major decision makers (i.e. President & Cabinet Members) are clustered in the national capital region, while the regional offices are given only recommendatory functions.


CONSIDERATIONS

1. Those publicly accused of CRIMES (like Human Rights violations, and Graft & Corruption) are NOT necessarily disqualified. To be fair, we should let the courts decide who are guilty and not guilty, based on evidence.

2. Those publicly accused of being EVIL are NOT necessarily disqualified. To be honest, people in general cannot read into the heart and conscience of an individual, except the very few who are gifted. In the end, only God can make the final judgment on who are good and evil.


KILUSAN NG MGA TAGAPAGTANGGOL NG BAYAN (KTB)
 Metro Manila, Philippines. 24 January 2022.


Saturday, September 25, 2021

Philippine Congress receives “People’s Draft” petition

 
Philippine Congress receives “People’s Draft” petition

The two houses of congress recently received a petition to revise the constitution with a “People’s Draft”, signed by various organizations and some individuals. The Philippine Senate received the petition two days ago while the House of Representatives also received the same petition a day later.
According to Atty. Dindo Donato, general counsel of Tangulang Demokrasya (TanDem) – lead proponent of the People’s Draft, the petition seeks action from our lawmakers to deliberate, approve, adopt and endorse the draft to the Commission on Elections for the conduct of a plebiscite “simultaneous with the national and local elections” next year.
“TanDem has initiated the framing of the People’s Draft four years ago and has had consultations with various groups and individuals to write the draft reflecting the desires of ordinary Filipinos”, said Donato. “Concerns voiced through those consultations include the creation of more meaningful and decent jobs in the country, the perennial fight against corruption, the need for better election process and the distribution of economic gains to the poorest of regions”, he added.
Still according to Donato, the result is a draft which seeks to promote “free and open competition in the economy through foreign investment liberalization, subject to safeguards and reciprocity; participation and consensus in governance through ’collegial rule’, vesting ultimate political power in the national assembly and the local councils; fair and equal opportunity in local governance through multiple ‘single-member districts’; immediate accountability for chief executives through removal by ‘vote of no confidence’; regional empowerment through delegation or devolution of major ‘decision-making powers’; and inclusive society of Christians, Muslims and Indigenous Peoples for national unity.”
Among the groups who signed the People’s Draft petition with TanDem include the Center for Preservation of Historical Rights of the Sulu Archipelago – an unincorporated people’s organization that advocates the preservation of the “History and Rights of the Sulu Sultanate”, and the CoRRECT (Constitutional Reform & Rectification for Economic Competitiveness & Transformation) Movement – a broad unincorporated alliance of overseas Filipino workers (OFWs), local employees, professionals, entrepreneurs, and the youth, that advocates the “Three Point Agenda” common among “constitutional reformers” (i.e. economic liberalization, evolving federalism, parliamentary system).
Also among the petitioners are the Kapatiran Party (or Alliance for the Common Good) – a national political party registered in the Philippines since 2004, and the Lumad Mindanaw Peoples Federation (LMPF) – a people’s organization registered as a non-stock corporation promoting the interests of the Indigenous People in Mindanao.
The individuals who signed the petition are political analyst Ma. Lourdes N. Tiquia, and former Congressman Wilfrido B. Villarama.
For its part, TanDem (Tanggulang Demokrasya) is a people’s organization of concerned citizens organized in 2010 under the guidance of its advisor, the late Fr. Romeo “Archie” J. Intengan, S.J. It was officially registered in 2012, with Mrs. Evelyn Kilayko as Chairperson and Mrs. Teresita Baltazar as President. Among the other advocacies of TanDem include transparency in automated elections as it supports the Hybrid Bill that calls for the manual counting or audit of votes cast, combined with the automated canvassing of precinct results.
There are several moves to reform the constitution already resulting in several drafts in the past. Most recently, there are the Bayanihan Draft written by a constitutional committee formed by President Rodrigo Duterte and the PDP Laban Draft written by members of the political party to which the president belongs. However, the People’s Draft is the only one that claims to be crowd-sourced, having gone through different revisions over the years from comments and suggestions from “crowds”. The People’s Draft is also the only one that comes from the ground up, meaning it is not initiated by government officials or institutions but by ordinary people, hence its name. - S. A. Mable
Mai News, 24 September 2021 https://www.facebook.com/permalink.php?story_fbid=4383590078345013&id=452401011463959